A re-sit versus a re-take

What distinguishes a re-sit from a re-take in the end point assessment?

For apprentices who do not pass one or more end point assessment methods, they can opt for a re-sit or a re-take of the assessment.

A re-sit involves the apprentice retaking one or more failed components of the EPA without the need for additional training. Re-sits are applicable only when an assessment has been failed and cannot be used to improve the grade (e.g., from a Pass to a Distinction).

On the other hand, a re-take requires the apprentice to undergo further learning before retaking the assessment. Feedback from the initial EPA results should be utilised by the employer and training provider to create a supportive action plan, pinpointing areas of weakness and developing a training plan to address these.

The action plan must clearly outline the nature and extent of the re-training, including the estimated time to prepare the apprentices for the re-take. The timescales will be agreed upon with the EPAO. Some assessment plans mandate a re-take if more than one element of the EPA is failed.

The ESFA recommends that apprentices undergo a maximum of two re-sits before considering a re-take. The decision usually rests with the employer, who is also responsible for the associated costs. Resits are ineligible costs and are not funded by the ESFA.

Apprentices should not bear the costs of additional training, assessment, re-sits, or re-takes. If you have questions about EPA, our team is ready to assist – feel free to reach out for more information.

Next steps:

• Connect with us: Reach out for a video call to explore our guidance or meet our team.

• Engage our services: Onboarding and scheduling sessions post-contract signing.

• Frequently Asked Questions: Answering queries regarding fees, switching EPAO providers, and ensuring a seamless transition.